The Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI’s) move to align risk weights1 of banks’ exposure to non-banking finance companies (NBFCs)2 with their respective credit ratings beneficial for both banks and NBFCs. Firstly, the release of capital for banks should increase deployment opportunities for banks. Secondly it enhances funding access for NBFCs.
So far banks have had to set aside capital assuming 100% risk weight uniformly for most NBFCs, barring specific categories such as asset finance companies (AFCs), infrastructure finance companies (IFCs) – including infrastructure debt funds structured as NBFCs (IDF-NBFCs) – and housing finance companies. This is set to be altered in the revised rating-based paradigm (see Annexure 1 for illustrative calculations for difference in capital requirements under the earlier and changed dispensation).
Says Krishnan Sitaraman, Senior Director, CRISIL Ratings, “The rating based approach for assigning risk weights will lead to capital savings for banks of ~Rs 13,000 crore, which will create additional lending headroom of ~Rs. 1.4 lakh crore3 for the banking system. Of this, banks could deploy a portion towards higher rated NBFCs given the lower risk weight for these entities.”
Bank debt to the NBFC sector has logged a compound annual growth rate of 20% in the past decade and reached a high of 55% as of December 2018. The first half of the current fiscal, saw a sharp increase in bank credit to NBFCs as bond yields spurted significantly, making market borrowings costlier thus spurring a rush for bank credit.
But then the IL&FS default resulted in an increase in negative sentiment towards NBFCs and reduction in funding access for them.
As a result, NBFCs resorted to higher securitisation, more of retail bond issuances and slowing down business growth to conserve liquidity as measures to meet the challenge. In this backdrop, the change in risk-weights should provide some respite for higher rated NBFCs.